Mountain Misfits

Mountain Misfits

Rethinking Bird Names in Ornithology

Birding,Thoughts

The air clung with a cool humidity under the dense canopy of conifers and riparian vegetation. Autumn forest was largely mute, save for the rush of Bass Creek. Under was a fungal splendor highlighted by Mycena, coral fungi, and the occasional Bear’s Head. Leaning over to get a closer view of 

Steller's Jay - Cyanocitta stelleri
Steller's Jay - Cyanocitta stelleri

Embracing Change in Ornithology – Rethinking Bird Names

A breeze of change is stirring in the ornithological world, one that carries with it the whispers of history and the songs of a more inclusive future. The American Ornithological Society’s (AOS) recent proposal – a decision to rename bird species that have long borne the names of historical figures. This move, rippling through the birding community, is not just a renaming exercise but a profound reflection of our times, where values of inclusion and recognition of diversity in nature and society converge.

Each name holds a story, a connection to our past, and a bridge to understanding. The AOS’s decision to reevaluate these names springs from a deep well of introspection and a desire to align the nomenclature of birds with physical/ecological characteristics and the principles of equity. This step, while seemingly small in the grand tapestry of nature, is monumental in its symbolism – it’s a commitment to removing the shadows of colonialism and racism that linger in the birding world.

However, this proposal has stirred a hornet’s nest, leading to a cacophony of diverse opinions. While some in the birding community view this as an overdue step towards rectifying historical wrongs and making birding a more inclusive hobby, others see it as an unnecessary ruffling of feathers, a disturbance to the established order and tradition in the birding community. This division of opinion opens a critical dialogue about the role of names in our connection with nature and the responsibility of scientific communities in shaping a narrative that is both inclusive and respectful.

All of this causes several questions to arise. What does a name signify in the grand scheme of nature’s diversity? How do we balance the legacy of the past with the needs of the present and the hopes for the future? Should birds (or any organism for that matter) be named after some dead white guy? These are questions not just for birders, but for all of us who share this planet and its rich, diverse tapestry of life.

Brewer's Sparrow - Spizella breweri
Brewer's Sparrow - Spizella breweri

The Controversy Behind the Change

In the shaded groves and sunlit meadows where birders gather, a spirited debate has taken wing (punny, I know). The AOS’s proposal to change eponymous bird names has stirred a nest of diverse opinions, echoing through the forests and across the birding blogs. 

The Case for Change

Advocates for the renaming see it as a necessary step towards a more inclusive and descriptive birding culture. They argue that many of the names we use today are relics of a colonial past, honoring individuals whose actions or beliefs may no longer align with contemporary values. Proponents believe that renaming these birds offers a chance to rectify historical oversights and create a more welcoming environment for all bird enthusiasts.

The Thick-billed Longspur, a bird species native to North America, was formerly known as the “McCown’s Longspur.” The original name honored John Porter McCown, a Confederate general during the American Civil War. McCown was also an amateur ornithologist, which led to the naming of the bird species after him in the 19th century. However, his association with the Confederacy and its defense of slavery led to calls for a reevaluation of this honor.

In 2020, the AOS decided to change the name from “McCown’s Longspur” to “Thick-billed Longspur.” This decision was part of a broader effort to remove names that are seen as glorifying or memorializing contentious historical figures from the names of bird species. The new name, “Thick-billed Longspur,” describes a prominent physical feature of the bird, its thick bill, which is a common practice in naming species.

Voices of Opposition

On the other side of the spectrum, some birders view this proposal as an overreaction. They argue that the names of birds like Anna’s Hummingbird or Cooper’s Hawk have transcended their original associations and are now simply terms of identification and familiarity, devoid of any historical baggage. For these individuals, the proposal seems to address a concern that is not widely shared, potentially disrupting a well-established naming convention for a perceived fringe issue.

Balancing Tradition and Progress

This debate is not just about names; it’s about how we, as a community, balance respect for tradition with the need for progress. It’s a reflection of a broader societal conversation about history, legacy, and inclusivity. The birding community, known for its passion and knowledge, finds itself at a crossroads, navigating the delicate balance between honoring the past and embracing a more inclusive future.

Swainson's Hawk - Buteo swainsoni

Why the Change is Necessary: Merging History with Modern Values

It is clear that the names we give to the birds that grace our skies are more than mere labels; they are reflections of our history, our values, and our relationship with the natural world. The American Ornithological Society’s proposal to change bird names historically tied to individuals is not merely a renaming process but a significant step towards aligning ornithology with contemporary values of inclusivity and reflecting the character of the bird.

Reflecting Modern Values in Naming

The impetus for this change is rooted in a growing recognition of the need for scientific disciplines, including ornithology, to be more inclusive and representative of a diverse society. The names of many bird species, coined during times of colonialism and racial inequality, often honor individuals whose actions or beliefs conflict with today’s values. By revisiting these names, the ornithological community acknowledges the need to disentangle the joy of birding from the shadows of the past.

Educational and Descriptive Benefits

Another compelling reason for this shift in naming convention is the potential for names to be more descriptive and informative. Instead of eponymous names, which often provide little insight into the bird’s characteristics or habitat, the new names could offer valuable information about the bird’s appearance, behavior, or natural environment. This change could make birding more accessible and educational, particularly for newcomers to the hobby.

Preserving Scientific Rigor with Latin Names

While English names are undergoing a reevaluation, Latin names, the bedrock of scientific classification, remain unchanged. These names, steeped in the language of science, provide consistency and continuity in the ornithological study. Their preservation ensures that, even as common names evolve, the scientific study of birds retains its rigor and universality.

We find ourselves at a beautiful confluence of history and modernity. It’s a testament to the ornithological community’s willingness to reflect on its practices and evolve, ensuring that our exploration of the avian world is not just a pursuit of knowledge, but also an expression of our values as a society.

Lincoln's Sparrow - Melospiza lincolnii
Lincoln's Sparrow - Melospiza lincolnii

A New Horizon in Birding

This initiative is more than just a shift in nomenclature. It represents a significant turning point in the world of ornithology – a convergence of history, science, and modern values.

Embracing Change for a Brighter Future

This proposal is a reflection of a birding community that is continually evolving, striving to be more inclusive, educational, and reflective of the world we live in. By reconsidering the names we give to the birds around us, we are not only acknowledging the often complex and controversial histories behind them but also opening up a new chapter that celebrates diversity, in the birding community.

The Power of Names

Names carry weight. They are not just identifiers but vessels of history, culture, and values. As we move towards renaming birds with names that are more descriptive and less burdened by historical baggage, we also step towards a future where birding is more accessible and enjoyable for everyone. This change, though challenging, is a testament to the birding community’s commitment to progress and inclusivity.

Tags :
Birding,Thoughts
Share This :

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Adventures